Friday, June 21, 2019 | ePaper

Borders should protect migrants, not turn them out

  • Print
Mark Sappenfield :
I might argue that the word "border" best encapsulates the leading challenge facing democracies worldwide today. The fundamental question in politics from Poland to Peoria right now is this: Who gets to define who "we" are? For centuries, European countries have defined their "we" rather simply. Poland is where the Poles live. Germany is where the Germans live, and so on. The United States was more diverse, yet until at least the 1960s had its "we" defined almost exclusively by white Christians and Jews.
Those rigid definitions, however, are put under considerable stress when free economic markets and universal human rights are brought into play. Put simply, they don't care about borders. In some ways, they see borders as an impediment.
Free markets compel the world to collaborate. They don't give a fig if you are American, African or Australian. They want you to work together to create better products and bigger markets in which to sell them. This is why groups like the World Economic Forum are seen by some as threats to national sovereignty. Their job is to expand wealth, and the greater the world's collaboration, the more wealth grows.
Human rights, meanwhile, compel us to focus on the humanity that binds us above the borders that separate us. They don't care where the refugee is from or where she is going. They care about ensuring her health, security, and innate value. This can contribute to concerns about a group like the United Nations, which is tasked with upholding not nation-states but "the dignity and worth of the human person," according to its charter.
Free markets and human rights are good, because we have seen categorical evidence that they make the world better. Yet who could say that borders are bad? Who would argue that an edict instantly removing them tomorrow would lead to anything but confusion and conflict? Fundamentally, this is what the world is wrestling with now: What are borders, really? In an evolving world, what should they do? Is it important to maintain national integrity and rule of law? Then those functions can be valued and strengthened. Is it an impediment to broader and mutually enriching collaboration on education and culture? Then those effects can be mitigated by making the border, in those cases, more permeable.
Of course, there's no perfect answer to every challenge. As with every policy, calibrating a border is a process of constant adaptation and recalibration. Increasingly, a border is becoming more of a tool than a 21st-century version of a moat and drawbridge. The world of today is asking new questions of every country. Borders can protect but not insulate.
-From the Christian Science Monitor News Service.

More News For this Category

ASEAN leaders must rethink about Rohingya crisis

SOUTHEAST Asian leaders must use their next summit to hold talks on Myanmar's treatment to the Rohingya, Rights Groups urged Wednesday, after a report by the bloc was pilloried for

Prevent any further unwanted incident at Payra Power Plant

A CHINESE worker, who was injured in a clash over the death of a worker at Payra 1320 MW Thermal Power Plant in Kalapara Upazila on Tuesday, died at Barishal

Data Protection

Taslim Ahammad :Data is something we take it for granted, however, data protection should be one of our big priorities. Sharing data may bring benefits on the other hand it

Fine Tuning of Budget

Md.  Ashraf  Hossain :Thanks to government for realising basic problem of capital market. Finance Minister rightly stated that listed companies had been depriving shareholders by transferring major portion of net

Readers’ Forum

Britain's politics and story of a failed nationThe Brexit that Prime Minister Theresa May has tried to engineer, a product of the internal tensions of her own party, was doomed

Govt's machinery is broken: HC's direction is welcome but will not work

Selling and storing of substandard and expired drugs in the pharmacies across the country have reached such a dangerous stage that it has now become extremely harmful for the public

Sustainable policy needed to check high inflation

POINT-to-point inflation increased for the five consecutive months in May to 5.63 per cent from 5.58 per cent in April mainly for price hike of non-food items including clothes and

Dwindling Political Morality

Muhammad Quamrul Islam :An enlightened young man returned from his village home after observance of holy Eid-ul-Fitr with his family to Uttara Dhaka on June 15, 2019 and opened his

Food Poisoning

Shishir Reza :Food poisoning is a common, usually mild, but sometimes deadly illness. Typical symptoms include nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramping, and diarrhea that occur suddenly (within 48 hours) after consuming

River grabbing must be stopped forever

NATIONAL River Conservation Commission has instructed District Administrations of Munshiganj and Narayanganj to send time-bound action plans for evicting grabbers from the Meghna, Sitalakhya and Dhaleswari and ensure close monitoring