Saturday, March 23, 2019 | ePaper

What happens if the Democrats take the House?

  • Print
Larry Beinhart :
To begin with, no one knows or can predict what will happen in the US midterms on November 6.  Polls used to be very accurate. We, as the public, viewed them as predictors of voting. As a commercial product employed both by political campaigns and businesses, they were disciplined by the demands of the market and had been one of the few true successes of the social sciences.
Yet something went wrong. Almost all the major political events of the past dozen years - the election of a black president, the collapse of the Democratic majority in his first midterms, his re-election, the nomination of Donald Trump, the election of Donald Trump, plus a Republican sweep of the house and senate - have been shocks and surprises.
At this point, we can't consider the polls to be much more than guesses. Informed, calculated, well-considered guesses, but still guesses.
The consensus of those guesses is that Democrats will take the House of Representatives and the Republicans will hold the Senate. Let's start with that scenario.
It would make for fabulous drama. More outrageous than House of Cards, not quite as murderous as Game of Thrones. The Democrats will control the house committees, meaning they'll control investigations and they will have subpoena power. Donald Trump, his family, and a multitude of his appointees have been accused of committing a wide-ranging and colourful assortment of crimes. So far, the Republican majority has been able to block any real investigations. With a Democratic majority, they will go forward with broad and endless publicity.
One possibility is a constitutional crisis. If recent history is a guide, the Trumpettes will claim extreme and unprecedented versions of executive privilege plus newly invented theories of why they don't have to answer questions. Congress and congressional committees have the authority to declare witnesses - or those who refuse to be witnesses - in contempt and detain them. However, the procedure, by agreement and by custom, is that Congress does not carry out contempt proceedings by itself. It refers them. To whom? To the Department of Justice.
In recent decades, the Department of Justice has dishonoured that obligation when it suited their politics. In 1982, Anne Gorsuch was Ronald Reagan's head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Like many EPA administrators appointed by Republican presidents, she thought it was her mission to diminish and destroy the agency she was in charge of.
Congress disagreed. They asked her to turn over documents. She didn't do so. The House voted to cite her for contempt. It was referred to the Department of Justice, where it died. The same happened with "EPA Assistant Administrator Rita Lavelle in 1983, White House Counsel Harriet Miers in 2008, White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten in 2008, Attorney General Holder in 2012 and IRS Director Lois Lerner in 2014". At that point, Congress can attempt to assert its authority by going to court for a writ of mandamus, compelling government officials to carry out their duties, or by changing the process and reclaiming the right of enforcement.
Best guess is that if they do either, it goes to the Supreme Court.
Then there are two best guesses. The five Republican, conservative judges - including Anne Gorsuch's son, Justice Neil Gorsuch - vote to protect their guys whatever the circumstances. The other possibility is that Chief Justice John Roberts would not want the Supreme Court under his watch to lose the rest of its respect and moral authority in the eye of the US public. If so, he may swing from the rhetorical law and order side to the actual law. (It's a shame that the judicial and political systems are so degraded that any hope boils down to the possibility that just one person has a moment of honour, putting principle above partisanship).
So hunker down, find the psychic fallout shelters, and watch old Marx Brothers movies to have something to laugh about.
(Larry Beinhart is a novelist, best known for Wag the Dog. Courtesy: Al Jazeera).

More News For this Category

Bring discipline in road transport sector

The country's transport sector is on total disarray. Killing of people by unlicensed and untrained drivers has become a common phenomenon.  Even yesterday, at least seven people were killed

Save Halda from dying

DEPARTMENT of Environment has revealed that waste from a housing estate and some factories are polluting the Halda river in Chattogram to the extent that it caused dying of

Readers’ Forum

Destruction of ecology under the nose of DoE Nowadays, the fruits and leaves of various trees across the northern region are dying due to impact of dust, fumes, smoke,

Christchurch shootings and role of Erdogan

Mark Lowen :It begins with dramatic music, edited in for effect.Then stills of the manifesto were posted by the gunman in New Zealand before his terror attack, highlighting and

Women's repression is a crime

Helal Uddin Ahmed :Many people consider feminist movement as a movement of the women community only. Most do not agree that male participation is also required for it to

EC is only a silent witness

VOTERS are apparently showing a little interest in the ongoing Upazila Elections, which has seen less than 15 percent voters turnout in at least four upazilas. Election Commission sources said

Europe`s worst genocide and Karadzic`s life imprisonment

IT'S another symbol of justice against a 'genocide' that had committed about 25 years ago by a powerful European ruler; Radovan Karadzic. The 73-year former Bosnian Serb leader has been

Failures of the UN to end Kashmir dispute

Mohammad Amjad Hossain :It is an irony that the United Nations could not succeed to resolve dispute between Pakistan and India over disputed Kashmir since 1948 having established Line of

The present US policy and global peace

Ilhan Omar :Since I began my first term in Congress, I have sought to speak openly and honestly about the scale of the issues our country faces - whether it

Readers’ Forum

Police verification in getting passport is still a hassle I see no end in sight of the suffering of the passport seekers related to police clearance. Despite several steps taken