Sunday, July 22, 2018 | ePaper

Validity period of affidavit

  • Print
High Court Division :
(Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction)
Farah Mahbub J
Mahmudul Hoque J
Khaza Tareq ........
......... Accused-Petitioner
(On Surrender)
vs
State ..... Opposite Parties·
Order
August 22nd, 2017
Supreme Court of Bangladesh (High Court Division) Rules, 1973
Chapter IVA rule 6(6)
The validity period of application for hearing of the same has already been expired.
Application is rejected summarily. . ..... (3 & 4)
AKM Alamgir Parvez Bhuiyan, Advocate-For the Opposite-Party No.2.
AKM Zahirul Huq, DAG with M Masud Atam Chowdhury, AAG and Sathi Shahjahan. AAG- For the State.
Order
In this application filed under section 498 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the petitioner has sought for anticipatory bail in Boalia Model Police Station Case No.7 dated 5-12-2016 under sections 409/ 420/467/468/471/109 of the Penal Code read with section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, now pending in the court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Rajshahi.
2. Chapter IVA Rule 6(6) of the Supreme Court (High Court Division) Rules, 1973 provides, inter-alia
"(6) Validity period of affidavit: An application/petition for motion in criminal cases shall be filed with the Bench Officer of an appropriate Bench within 45 days after the affidavit is sworn in and on the expiry of the said 45 days validity of the affidavit shall expire.
Explanation : The period of 45 days shall not be construed as an extension of the period  of limitation, if any."  
3. In view of the above, the validity period of this application for hearing of the same has already been expired.
4. Accordingly, this application is rejected summarily.
Communicate the order at once.

More News For this Category

Setting dispute related to the propriety of decision

(From previous issue) :BUET:Total capacity of the gas line, as claimed by TITAS gas, as 1,570,000 cft/hr is correct if Titas Dhanua station gas pressure is 140 psi and

When a tenant can seek his re-instatement

High Court Division :(Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Md Emdadul Hug J     FRM Nazmul Ahasan JBata Shoe Company  (Bangladesh) Ltd …… ................. Appellant vsHassan Movies Ltd ………… ............. RespondentJudgment November

Sending a suit on remand for trial

High Court Division :(Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Md Miftah Uddin Choudhury J ANM Bashir Ullah J Kismat Traders and others …….Appellants vs Pubali Bank Limited and others ……............. Respondents· Judgment

Settling dispute related to the propriety of decision

High Court Division :(Special Original Jurisdiction) Naima Haider JATM Saifur Rahman JJudgment October 31st, 2017TM Textiles and Garments Ltd.... PetitionervsBangladesh, represented by the Secretary Ministry of Power, Energy and 

Death penalty is not unconstitutional

Appellate Division :(Criminal) Md Abdul Wahhab Miah JSyed Mahmud Hossain JMd Imman Ali JHasan Foez Siddique JMirza Hussain Halder JKmmal alias Exol Kamal.........AppellantvsState............RespondentJudgment October 10th, 2017Code of Criminal Procedure

Accused be allowed to produce defence evidence

  High Court Division :Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) Md Emdadul Huq J FRM Nazmul Ahasan JShariful Haque (Md) …………………….Petitioner  vsState represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka & another………....... Opposite Parties*

Adjudication process at the grassroots

Dr. M Abul Kashem Mozumder and  Dr. Md. Shairul Mashreque :A number of studies have appeared  on the topic like gram adalat((Masahreque 1995, 2002, Mashreque and Amin  1995, and

Rights of partners to claim property shares

Appellate Division :(Civil) Surendra Kumar Sinha CJ Syed Mahmud Hossain J Hasan Foez Siddique J Mirza Hussain Haider J Md Bazlur Rahman J Khosrur Rashid (Md) and others ………

Validity period of affidavit

High Court Division :(Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction)Farah Mahbub J Mahmudul Hoque J Khaza Tareq ................. Accused-Petitioner (On Surrender) vsState ..... Opposite Parties· Order August 22nd, 2017 Supreme Court of Bangladesh

Can a 3rd party be precluded for contesting a fraudulent deed?

(From previous issue) :After assessing the evidence, the High Court Division came to a finding that "the defendants had/have been in exclusive possession of the Ghar which is situated