Thursday, March 21, 2019 | ePaper

Validity period of affidavit

  • Print
High Court Division :
(Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction)
Farah Mahbub J
Mahmudul Hoque J
Khaza Tareq ........
......... Accused-Petitioner
(On Surrender)
State ..... Opposite Parties·
August 22nd, 2017
Supreme Court of Bangladesh (High Court Division) Rules, 1973
Chapter IVA rule 6(6)
The validity period of application for hearing of the same has already been expired.
Application is rejected summarily. . ..... (3 & 4)
AKM Alamgir Parvez Bhuiyan, Advocate-For the Opposite-Party No.2.
AKM Zahirul Huq, DAG with M Masud Atam Chowdhury, AAG and Sathi Shahjahan. AAG- For the State.
In this application filed under section 498 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the petitioner has sought for anticipatory bail in Boalia Model Police Station Case No.7 dated 5-12-2016 under sections 409/ 420/467/468/471/109 of the Penal Code read with section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, now pending in the court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Rajshahi.
2. Chapter IVA Rule 6(6) of the Supreme Court (High Court Division) Rules, 1973 provides, inter-alia
"(6) Validity period of affidavit: An application/petition for motion in criminal cases shall be filed with the Bench Officer of an appropriate Bench within 45 days after the affidavit is sworn in and on the expiry of the said 45 days validity of the affidavit shall expire.
Explanation : The period of 45 days shall not be construed as an extension of the period  of limitation, if any."  
3. In view of the above, the validity period of this application for hearing of the same has already been expired.
4. Accordingly, this application is rejected summarily.
Communicate the order at once.

More News For this Category

Suit for Specific Performance Contract

High Court Division :(Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Md Rais Uddin JAbdul Aziz.............PetitionervsMd Jalal Uddin.........Opposite-PartyJudgmentOctober 8th, 2018Specific Performance of Contract In the suit for Spacific Performance of Contract the plaintiff is

Bringing goods evading customs is a punishable offence

High Court Division :(Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) ANM Bashir Ullah J }     . Mohammad Ullah  J }    Abdullah (Md) Accused-Petitioner                 VSState …………Opposite PartyJudgmentMarch 11th, 2018 Code of Criminal Procedure (V

Every person is answerable for the truth of his statement

Appellate Division (Civil)  :Syed Mahmud Hossain   J }  Hasan Foez Siddique     J  } Mirza Hussain Haider    J } Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works,Government of Bangladesh Dhaka and others……………

The public prosecutor should have acted lawfully

High Court Division :(Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) ANM Bashir Ullah J Mohammad Ullah JShowkot Osman Khondakar (Md)..........PetitionervsMd Amzad Hossain and 6 (six) others..........Opposite-PartiesJudgmentFebruary 20th, 2018Code of Criminal Procedure (V of

Writ-petitioner at liberty to go to administrative tribunal

Appellate Division  (Civil) Md Abdul Wahhab Miah J        Syed Mahmud Hossain JMd Imman Ali JHasan Foez Siddique         J     Mirza Hussain Haider       J Bangladesh Krishi  Bank and others-----------Appellants                                 VsArun

Process of law is not an engine of harassment

High Court Division :(Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Sheikh Abdul Awal JBhishmadevChakrabortty JAlamgir Matubbar (Md). ...........Accused-AppellantvsState ...........RespondentJudgmentJuy 18th, 2018Code of Criminal Procedure (V of 1898) Sections 173 and 561A The investigating

Order should follow the subsequent enforcement of law

High Court Division :(Civil Revisional Jurisdiction)Md Moinul IslamChowdhury JAbu Siddique (Md)…………..PetitionerVsDM Habibur Rahman and others…………Opposite-PartiesJudgmentFebruary 5th, 2018Muslim Marriages and Divorce (Registration) Rules, 2009Rule 13 A person cannot be a

‘Nobody’ has authority to sign for the company

High Court Division :(Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction)Farah Mahbub JMahmudul Hoque JShahidul Islam (Md)……………..Accused-Petitioner (in all the cases) Vs State and another………Opposite-Parties (in all the cases)JudgmentFebruary 5th, 2018Code of Criminal Procedure

Normal financial transaction do not come within the scope of any offence

Appellate Division (Criminal) Nazmun Ara Sultana J       }MASukkur     . Syed Mahmud Hossain J   } ……..Appellant                                         Md Imman Ali J                 }       vs Judgment                               }Md Zahirul Haque May

No provision for fresh limitation from final order

High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction)Sheikh Hassan Arif J  }  Mohitur Rahman Choudhury (Md) and Md Badruzzaman  J    } others………Petitioners                                    }                 VSJudgment                    } Md Abdul Kuddus Miah and others------April