Tuesday, July 17, 2018 | ePaper

Hindu Marriage Dissolution Act needed

  • Print
Zahid Ahammad Hero :
Hindu marriage is treated as a sacrament, or a sanskara, Under Hindu shastra or law, the concept of marriage is more of a religious than secular institution.
According to Hindu religious mandate, marriage is deemed as the last of 10 sacraments enjoined by Hindu religion for purifying the body. So marriage, according to Hindu law, is a holy union for the performance of religious duties. But for the solemnization of a Hindu marriage, some nuptial rites or religious rituals are absolutely essential for the validity of the marriage.
Amongst the good number of rituals, two are considered as the most important ceremonies for the validity of a Hindu marriage firstly invocation before the sacred fire, and secondly taking of seven steps by the bride and bridegroom around the sacred fire. Only then the Hindu marriage assumes the sacred character and sacrament which constitutes a relationship of body and soul between husband and wife. So, marriage according to Hindu shastra, creates an indissoluble tie between husband and wife which lasts beyond the grave.
Whenever the question of divorce or dissolution of a Hindu marriage arises, it becomes a very thorny issue. Hindu law strictly does not allow divorce. So, neither party can divorce the other, unless divorce is allowed by some longstanding custom of certain communities.
But in the context of modem life, it cannot be reasonably, as well as practicably, contemplated that an unhappy Hindu couple will continue to live a maladjusted conjugal life forever. There may be several causes for marital dissolution i.e. the wife or the husband may suffer from mental problems, one may treat the other with cruelty, the husband might desert the wife for an uncertain period, etc. From the Hindu point of view, since a marriage is regarded as an indissoluble union of husband and wife extending to the next world, what happens if it becomes an irreconcilable union? What is the solution then?
In India, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was passed allowing divorce for Hindu couples on some grounds specified therein, such as cruelty, unsoundness of mind, desertion, adultery, etc. And this Act has brought some material and important changes to the orthodox Hindu law relating to marriage.
The law also allows separation by mutual consent.
A civil court in India, on the petition of either party, in due process of law can pass a decree for judicial separation in a Hindu marriage. But why has Bangladesh not adopted a similar legislation? Needless to say, there is ardent necessity to enact a separate law to allow separation in a Hindu marriage here, keeping in mind the socio-economic context of the present society.
In our country, there is a legislation named Family Courts Ordinance, 1985 which deals with matters of marriage, divorce, custody, maintenance and so on. Though in the said ordinance, it has not been made absolutely clear whether it is applicable to the citizens of all religions beliefs. But the Higher courts, through establishing judicial precedence, says that a person of any faith has got every right to bring suit for the purposes as contained in Section 5 of the Ordinance.
Section 5 of the Family Courts Ordinance, 1985 provides that a family court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to try and dispose of any suit relating to guardianship and custody of children, maintenance, dissolution of marriage, dower, and so on. Thus, a Hindu wife is not debarred from filing a law suit for maintenance against her husband under this Ordinance. So, why not in any other matter mentioned in the section, like dissolution of marriage? Besides, the Ordinance has to be applied in conformity with the equality clause of our constitution to maintain its constitutional validity.
So, a separate and distinct legislation, such as a 'Hindu Marriage Dissolution Act' similar to the Muslim Marriage Dissolution Act, 1939, is highly required for the benefit of our Hindu community.
If India, being a Hindu-majority country, can do that, then why can't we?

More News For this Category

Settling dispute related to the propriety of decision

High Court Division :(Special Original Jurisdiction) Naima Haider JATM Saifur Rahman JJudgment October 31st, 2017TM Textiles and Garments Ltd.... PetitionervsBangladesh, represented by the Secretary Ministry of Power, Energy and 

Death penalty is not unconstitutional

Appellate Division :(Criminal) Md Abdul Wahhab Miah JSyed Mahmud Hossain JMd Imman Ali JHasan Foez Siddique JMirza Hussain Halder JKmmal alias Exol Kamal.........AppellantvsState............RespondentJudgment October 10th, 2017Code of Criminal Procedure

Accused be allowed to produce defence evidence

  High Court Division :Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) Md Emdadul Huq J FRM Nazmul Ahasan JShariful Haque (Md) …………………….Petitioner  vsState represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka & another………....... Opposite Parties*

Adjudication process at the grassroots

Dr. M Abul Kashem Mozumder and  Dr. Md. Shairul Mashreque :A number of studies have appeared  on the topic like gram adalat((Masahreque 1995, 2002, Mashreque and Amin  1995, and

Rights of partners to claim property shares

Appellate Division :(Civil) Surendra Kumar Sinha CJ Syed Mahmud Hossain J Hasan Foez Siddique J Mirza Hussain Haider J Md Bazlur Rahman J Khosrur Rashid (Md) and others ………

Validity period of affidavit

High Court Division :(Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction)Farah Mahbub J Mahmudul Hoque J Khaza Tareq ................. Accused-Petitioner (On Surrender) vsState ..... Opposite Parties· Order August 22nd, 2017 Supreme Court of Bangladesh

Can a 3rd party be precluded for contesting a fraudulent deed?

(From previous issue) :After assessing the evidence, the High Court Division came to a finding that "the defendants had/have been in exclusive possession of the Ghar which is situated

Lending banks' liability in pledge loan

Appellate Division :(Civil) Surendra Kumar Sinha CJSyed Mahmud Hossain JHasan Foez Siddique JMirza Hussain Haider JNimal Chandra Biswas ………….PetitionerVsSonali Bank, Dhaka and another ………..RespondentsJudgmentMarch 20th, 2016Artha Rin Adalat Ain

Can there be successive prosecution?

(From previous issue) :The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, is essentially akin to the Money Laundering Protirodh Ain of Bangladesh, as it creates the offence of money laundering and

Can a 3rd party be precluded for contesting a fraudulent deed?

Appellate Division :(Civil) Nazmun Ara Sultana J Md Imman Ali J Md Nizamul Huq J         Altab Hossain Sikder and others ………. ………..Appellants vs Abdul Malek Sikder and