Monday, September 24, 2018 | ePaper

Hindu Marriage Dissolution Act needed

  • Print
Zahid Ahammad Hero :
Hindu marriage is treated as a sacrament, or a sanskara, Under Hindu shastra or law, the concept of marriage is more of a religious than secular institution.
According to Hindu religious mandate, marriage is deemed as the last of 10 sacraments enjoined by Hindu religion for purifying the body. So marriage, according to Hindu law, is a holy union for the performance of religious duties. But for the solemnization of a Hindu marriage, some nuptial rites or religious rituals are absolutely essential for the validity of the marriage.
Amongst the good number of rituals, two are considered as the most important ceremonies for the validity of a Hindu marriage firstly invocation before the sacred fire, and secondly taking of seven steps by the bride and bridegroom around the sacred fire. Only then the Hindu marriage assumes the sacred character and sacrament which constitutes a relationship of body and soul between husband and wife. So, marriage according to Hindu shastra, creates an indissoluble tie between husband and wife which lasts beyond the grave.
Whenever the question of divorce or dissolution of a Hindu marriage arises, it becomes a very thorny issue. Hindu law strictly does not allow divorce. So, neither party can divorce the other, unless divorce is allowed by some longstanding custom of certain communities.
But in the context of modem life, it cannot be reasonably, as well as practicably, contemplated that an unhappy Hindu couple will continue to live a maladjusted conjugal life forever. There may be several causes for marital dissolution i.e. the wife or the husband may suffer from mental problems, one may treat the other with cruelty, the husband might desert the wife for an uncertain period, etc. From the Hindu point of view, since a marriage is regarded as an indissoluble union of husband and wife extending to the next world, what happens if it becomes an irreconcilable union? What is the solution then?
In India, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was passed allowing divorce for Hindu couples on some grounds specified therein, such as cruelty, unsoundness of mind, desertion, adultery, etc. And this Act has brought some material and important changes to the orthodox Hindu law relating to marriage.
The law also allows separation by mutual consent.
A civil court in India, on the petition of either party, in due process of law can pass a decree for judicial separation in a Hindu marriage. But why has Bangladesh not adopted a similar legislation? Needless to say, there is ardent necessity to enact a separate law to allow separation in a Hindu marriage here, keeping in mind the socio-economic context of the present society.
In our country, there is a legislation named Family Courts Ordinance, 1985 which deals with matters of marriage, divorce, custody, maintenance and so on. Though in the said ordinance, it has not been made absolutely clear whether it is applicable to the citizens of all religions beliefs. But the Higher courts, through establishing judicial precedence, says that a person of any faith has got every right to bring suit for the purposes as contained in Section 5 of the Ordinance.
Section 5 of the Family Courts Ordinance, 1985 provides that a family court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to try and dispose of any suit relating to guardianship and custody of children, maintenance, dissolution of marriage, dower, and so on. Thus, a Hindu wife is not debarred from filing a law suit for maintenance against her husband under this Ordinance. So, why not in any other matter mentioned in the section, like dissolution of marriage? Besides, the Ordinance has to be applied in conformity with the equality clause of our constitution to maintain its constitutional validity.
So, a separate and distinct legislation, such as a 'Hindu Marriage Dissolution Act' similar to the Muslim Marriage Dissolution Act, 1939, is highly required for the benefit of our Hindu community.
If India, being a Hindu-majority country, can do that, then why can't we?

More News For this Category

Arbitration clause of the agreement be tried first

(From previous issue) :In a case such as this we are of opinion the suit is not on the face of it barred by law. The very arguments which

Calculation of interest on decree amount

High Court Division :(Special Original Jurisdiction)Zinat Ara JAKM Zahirul Hoque JTopman Fashion WearsLimited..........PetitionervsDutch Bangla Bank Limited and others...............RespondentsJudgmentFebruary 15th, 2017Artha Rin Adalat Ain (VIII of 2003)Section 50(4)Under Section 50(4)

Principle of double jeopardy

(From previous issue) :39. In respect of these material exhibits no suggestion has been given by the defence that these materials are not belonged to the victim of the

Quashing proceeding of case pending before the court below

High Court Division :(Special Original Jurisdiction) Moyeenul IslamChowdhury JMd Ashraful Kamal J AKM Zakaria Hossain Choudhury ..... Petitioner vsChief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka and others     RespondentsJudgmentJudgment, May 21,st, 2018

Principle of double jeopardy

(From previous issue) :20. Upon scrutiny of the evidence adduced by the prosecution witnesses along with exhibits as well as material exhibits it has emerged that the learned defence

Arbitration clause of the agreement be tried first

High Court Division :(Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Syed Md Ziaul Karim JSheikh Md Zakir Hossain JMizanur Rahman (Md) .......................Plaintiff-Appellant vsManaging Director, and CEO Agrani Bank Ltd ............Defendant No. 1 RespondentJudgmentJanuary

Killing a burglar in self-defence : UK Law

Barrister M. A. Muid Khan :Prologue "…HOMEOWNERS can defend themselves against raiders who break into their house…" (Justice Secretary David Gauke, 6th April 2018, London, UK) In the wake

Principle of double jeopardy

High Court Division :(Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction)Jahangir Hossain JMd Jahangir Hossain JState...........PetitionervsMd Abul Kashem Kha................Condemned-PrisonerJudgmentJanuary 20th, 2016Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972Article 35(2)Code of Criminal Procedure (V of 1898)Section 403No person shall

The conduct of the Commission raises serious questions

High Court Division(Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) M Enayetur Rahim J Shahidul Karim J Judgment     I November 8th, 2017Salim (Md) .... Petitioner  vsState and another............... Opposite-PartiesCode of Criminal Procedure (V of

Loan once admitted cannot be subsequently denied

(From previous issue)15. He has further argued that the plaintiff and defendants by amicable settlement came to compromise and by dint of that compromise prepared application and Solenama signing by