Monday, April 23, 2018 | ePaper

G20's record does not inspire hope

  • Print
Anis Chowdhury and Jomo Kwame Sundaram :
The G20 leaders meeting in Hamburg, Germany, on 7-8 July comes almost a decade after the grouping's elevation to meeting at the heads of state/government level. Previously, the G20 had been an informal forum of finance ministers and central bank governors from advanced and emerging economies created in 1999 following the 1997-1998 Asian financial crisis.
Expectations of the Hamburg G20 summit are now quite modest, and there is greater media and public interest in the bilateral meetings around the event. It is a sad reminder that needed reforms to improve the world economy and the welfare of its people are unlikely to come from the G20, and tragically, from any other quarter for some time to come.
The new grouping's record in steering the global economy since the first summit in Washington, DC in November 2008 after the global financial crisis (GFC) was acknowledged by financial markets to have begun a couple of months before.
London Summit's high point
At the following April 2009 London Summit, hosted by Gordon Brown, the G20 leaders demonstrated unprecedented solidarity in confronting the global meltdown with financial packages for the IMF, World Bank and others worth USD1.1 trillion. The London financial package included USD250 billion to help developing countries secure trade finance in the face of financial uncertainty.
These measures succeeded in turning the tide, with world economic growth recovering robustly from minus 2.1% in 2009 to plus 4.1% in 2010, exceeding the pre-crisis 2007 level of 3.8%. G20 boosters are inclined to claim that the London Summit pulled the global economy from the cusp of the first post-Second World War "great depression".
However, there has been little evidence of how the funds may have saved the world economy. There has been modest trade growth since 2008 - after earlier sustained trade expansion - as most G20 member countries introduced essentially 'protectionist' trade measures despite their declared commitment to the contrary. The leaders also agreed to develop new financial regulations and improve financial supervision, but the patchwork which emerged has had limited and mixed consequences.
Toronto U turn
G20 leadership, evident at the April 2009 London summit, was abdicated with its U turn at the June 2010 Toronto summit while claiming success for its earlier collective efforts. The Canadian hosts trumpeted its own strong recovery from around -3% in 2009 to +3% in 2010 as the G20 exaggerated hints of recovery to pave the way for 'fiscal consolidation' instead.
Expectations of the Hamburg G20 summit are now quite modest, and there is greater media and public interest in the bilateral meetings around the event. It is a sad reminder that needed reforms to improve the world economy and the welfare of its people are unlikely to come from the G20, and tragically, from any other quarter for some time to come.
Canada received strong support from Germany and Japan which also claimed strong recoveries. Further support came from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the European Central Bank (ECB) which invoked the 'expansionary fiscal consolidation hypothesis' to claim that urgent U turns would boost investor confidence to sustain economic recovery.
The U turn from Keynesian-style debt-financed fiscal stimulus measures deprived the modest recovery of the means for sustaining renewed expansion, thus ensuring the GFC's 'Great Recession', which has dragged on in much of the North for almost a decade since, dragging down world and developing country growth in recent years.
Recession self-inflicted
Despite warnings from the United Nations and a few others against premature fiscal consolidation, G20 leaders at the Toronto Summit agreed to cut budget deficits in half by 2013, and to eliminate deficits altogether by 2016! The decision triggered a double dip recession in Japan and some Eurozone countries.
Canada and Germany, which pushed for rapid fiscal consolidation, have since experienced significantly slower growth averaging 1.8% and 1.2% respectively. The global economy thus began a prolonged period of anaemic growth averaging around 2.5% per annum.
Clearly, G20 economic growth continues to be modest. They are still unable to attain the 2010 growth rate, giving the lie to the 'expansionary fiscal consolidation' claim. The IMF has since acknowledged that its initial recommendation of rapid fiscal consolidation was based on "back of the envelope" calculations!
Research also shows that fiscal consolidation has exacerbated income inequality while fiscal consolidation basically began once financial sectors had been rescued from the consequences of their own greedy operations.
Lack of accountability to the rest of the world has also meant that the G20 continues to undermine multilateralism. Inclusive multilateralism is now being threatened on many other fronts as well, not least by the Trumpian turn in the White House and the growing tendency for the Europeans to act as a bloc.
The G20's broader membership has made negotiations and consultations more difficult than those involving the G7 grouping of major developed economies. But its greater inclusion and diversity has also ensured its superior record compared to the G7, which continues to decline in relevance.
As the Toronto U turn and its devastating legacy remind us, the G20's finest moment after its London summit in 2009 was easily reversed through host country efforts although the US and China were acting quite differently in practice.
Expectations of the Hamburg G20 summit are now quite modest, and there is greater media and public interest in the bilateral meetings around the event. It is a sad reminder that needed reforms to improve the world economy and the welfare of its people are unlikely to come from the G20, and tragically, from any other quarter for some time to come.

Courtesy: IPS

More News For this Category

Learn to be competent, lives are lost in road accident

ROAD safety measures have largely been ignored for years amid series of fatal accidents on roads and highways across the country. A passengers' rights platform reported that between January 1

Govt must answer what happened to the force disappearances

MEMBERS of around 80 families joined a programme under the banner of "Mayer Daak", a platform of disappearance victims' family members, from across the country on April 21st, as per

Project delayed, project denied

Dr. Forqan Uddin Ahmed :The title name of the topic resembles the saying - justice delayed justice denied. We all know the very meaning of it. But we ignore it.

Fake democracy always poses grave threat to sovereignty!

M A Hossain :There is no room for adopting any self- styled democracy by replacing the theory of Abraham Lincoln's democracy. In today's world, we hear from some rulers that

Stability, not war, is answer to Lebanon's problems

Christiane Waked  :Neither Lebanon nor the world wants a new round of destruction and war; instead Lebanon needs stability and economic growth now more than ever before.Despite alarming articles such

Readers’ Forum

Stop harassment of protestersAfter the prime minister announced the scrapping of the quota system in the public service recruitment process, protesters called off their movement but were still harassed by

None pays heed to public sufferings

THE rainy season is not far away. Whereas two Dhaka City Corporation (DCC) authorities have permitted different utility service providers to dig up road surface without taking into account that

Enforce counter-trafficking law

NONE of over 3,500 cases filed under the counter-trafficking law across the country has disposed of since the formulation of the act. It has left the victims and their families

Democratic globalisation

Federico Mayor Zaragoza :"If we don't do everything possible to democratize globalization, globalization will pervert national democracies", said the former Secretary-General of the United Nations, as President of the "International

Improving anti-money laundering operations

Clay R. Fuller :Interest is growing in illicit finance because great-power competition is playing out in boardrooms, stock markets, trade wars, and compliance departments. The US anti-money laundering (AML) regime